Very rare-The BEST STUDIO PRO drivers ever made by JBL.Used in most regarded and expensive STUDIO speakers such JBL 4345 and B460 wooferThe JBL Model 2245H is a professional quality low frequency transducer designed for use in custom studio monitors or other applications requiring high sensitivity. 22 hours ago  Best high SPL 1.4/1.5' (coaxial) compression driver / DCX464, BMS 4595.? In pursuit of an SPL monster, which delivers quality, I'm hoping to enquire the SPL I would expect from drivers like the DCX464 or BMS 4595. Other high SPL coaxial options might be out there, so suggestions welcome!

The BMS drivers have the smallest diaphragms of the copmression tested, whether this type comperssion distortion is simply the result of the higher throat SPL required by the smaller diaphragm and exit diameter, or the driver design itself is an unanswered question. This is an amazing compression driver design. I wonder how much it will cost? I also wonder who, if anyone is producing horns or waveguides that will accommodate a 6' compression driver, and can hold pattern from 300hz all the way to 20,000hz? The dB-Design uses in their Orphean horns the coaxial BMS 4592ND driver. They claim that they highly modify the driver (whatever it means). I do not know the externs of the modification but I’m sure that wherever they do they keep the coaxial concept unchanged.

I am in the midst of my next speaker project. For bass I have obtained a couple of JBL 2225H (these are actually 2205H reconed by JBL kit as a 2225H - I have always been a fan of the small difference in SPL of the Alnicos at lower power) and will build a box to the JBL speaker enclosure guidelines. My plan is to use a very pretty 800hz Oak horn lens and I am leaning toward the BMS coax 2' compression driver - either the 4590 or the 4592 (neodidium-sp?- lighter and efficient magnet in the 92). I will be using a 1.5' throat on the lens with an adapter for the 2' driver - kinda copying that extended throat thingy that Altec did on some of their horns. The problem is that, while I cannot find any bad reviews of the driver, there are very few reviews by folks that I have a history with and can understand how they speak to what they hear. Anyone here had an opportunity to listen to the BMS? Thanks in advance.

Well Maron - I catch the drift of the article. It was interesting to see the similarities of performance with regard to second order harmonics up to somewhere just past 5K. So - sticking with my deal seems to show higher distortion begining some where before my crossover to the HF diaphram at 6.5Khz. Up to that point I would have been reasonably ok, but I am going to rethink - I don't need greater distortion at that critical Xover point and considering I will need less distrotion through about 8khz to keep it smooth, I'll go to the 2' throat and drain the pocketbook a bit more.

Regular speedrunners often collaborate with TAS speedrunners to find the quickest ways of beating a game. Atari 2600, 7800 and Lynx. This list isn't definitive as BizHawk also supports emulation cores. BizHawk has native support for emulating the following systems.

Bms Coaxial Compression Driver For Mac Download

The coax, due to its nature (a single exit, dual diaphram), has a small throat to accomondate the two drivers. The second order harmonics measures on par with the JBL when a 700hz, 2' lens is used (actually it measures quite a bit better in the 9Khz range up - may be more due to the JBL using the single diaphram). Still wondering if anyone here has heard the driver.